Презентация Competition and its place in international trade онлайн

Содержание слайда: Topic 2: Competition and its place in international trade

Содержание слайда: Typical models of international imperfect competition Typical models of international imperfect competition Models of international monopolistic competition intra-industry competition (economy of scale) Krugman, Dixit-Stiglitz, Cournout inter-industry competition (product differentiation) spacial competition (difference in transportation costs) 2. Models of international oligopolistic competition (for duopoly) international leadership on the amount of goods international leadership on prices international cartel (negative consequences)

Содержание слайда: 3. Models of pure international monopoly 3. Models of pure international monopoly monopoly of national company on national market monopoly of national company on national market and in export monopoly of national company on internal market but competition in export foreign company has monopoly positions on internal market

Содержание слайда: International trade models and imperfect competition International trade models and imperfect competition HO model, Leontiev paradox (competition in result of difference between production factors) Neotechnological models: comparative advantage from product differentiation (rises from production factors) “technological lag” of Pozner: comparative advantage of countries which have innovations. During time country loses such advantage. “model of product life cycle” of Pozner: same comparative advantage which appears only on stages of technology introduction and fast growth of company

Содержание слайда: The working horse of analysis of competition’s influence on trade between countries is a Dixit-Stiglitz model that assumes that effective trade is a result of specialization differentiation (basing Ricardian and HO trade theory). However economists have elaborated many ways of denial of such theory. The working horse of analysis of competition’s influence on trade between countries is a Dixit-Stiglitz model that assumes that effective trade is a result of specialization differentiation (basing Ricardian and HO trade theory). However economists have elaborated many ways of denial of such theory. “model of intra-industry trade” (Grubel, Lloyd): competitiveness due similarity of structure of consumption in countries. “model of economy of scale” (Kisting, Hafbauer): increase of competitiveness due to economy of scale (lower marginal costs) Krugman’s theories

Содержание слайда: Intra-industry imperfect competition Intra-industry imperfect competition Intra-industry trade accounts for about ¼ of world trade Mostly in manufacturing goods among advanced industrial economies. Not between developed and developing countries as Ricardian and HO models would predict. And mostly within the same industry with no difference in their comparative advantage

Содержание слайда: Paul Krugman won 2008 Nobel prize Paul Krugman won 2008 Nobel prize - Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade, P. Krugman, Journal of International Economics 9: 469–479, 1979 - Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade, P. Krugman, American Economic Review 70: 950–959, 1980

Содержание слайда: What’s the core idea? What’s the core idea? It is a theory that can explain why countries (and firms) have incentives to trade with each other, even though there is no comparative advantage involved. Like Ricardian and HO theory, there have to be gains from international trade to motivate trading activities. So where do these gains come from? In Krugman’s theory, the extra gains come from economies of scale, where each firm produces less varieties of goods, but at much larger scale, driving down the average cost of production. Thus, firms in each country can produce similar goods but with different characteristics (or product differentiation) at much larger scale (with lower cost). These goods are similar but not direct substitutes. Because consumers have taste for varieties, intra-industry trade rises.

Содержание слайда: Internal vs External Economies of scale Internal vs External Economies of scale - Internal is based upon intra-company activity that leads to increase of supplied volumes of goods and decrease of marginal costs - External Economies of Scale Firms clustering together in certain location = subject of Economics of Geography Examples: Silicon Valley as technology center Why do firms (or individuals) behave in such way? What are the benefits from such location choice?

Содержание слайда: External Economies of Scale External Economies of Scale Sources of gains: Specialized suppliers Labor market pooling Knowledge spillovers What are the key differences between internal and external economies of scale? Internal gains come from larger market scale because there is a initial fixed cost, implying that the larger the scale, the more efficient (or less costly) they can produce. External gains are not from within the firm; rather, they are from the externalities generated from firms clustering together.

Содержание слайда: Impact of External Economies of Scale Impact of External Economies of Scale It could have similar effects as internal economies of scale: The clustering of firms will bring down the cost of production: easy access to suppliers and labor pool Technology spillovers could spur innovation, another way of bringing down cost In addition, firm clustering tends to reinforce specialization choices at the beginning, which may have some unintended consequences.

Содержание слайда: Switzerland watch industry Switzerland specializes in watch making due to mysterious unknown historical/cultural reasons. But in short, they are good at making watches. Over time, as income of Switzerland rises, their cost of watch making is also rising. But because of their early specialization in watch industry and the external scale of economies generated from this long-time watch making (learning curve), it makes new competitor’s entry into the market very difficult. And the world may face a welfare loss as a result of trade