Презентация Risky business. Making decisions under uncertainty онлайн

Содержание слайда: University of Minnesota The Healthcare Marketplace Medical Industry Leadership Institute Course: MILI 6990/5990 Spring Semester A, 2015 Stephen T. Parente, Ph.D. Carlson School of Management Department of Finance sparente@umn.edu

Содержание слайда: Overview Next unit up - Insurers Insurance theory & concepts Risk & uncertainty Insurance premiums Evolution of modern health insurance Public insurance Private insurance The state of health insurance today

Содержание слайда: Risky Business: Making Decisions Under Uncertainty Uncertainty: A situation when more than one event may occur but we don’t know which one. Ex. 1: Invest in Intel without knowing how their newest processor will be received in 2 months. Ex. 2 Decide to not get a flu shot this year.

Содержание слайда: Risk Defined Risk: The probability of incurring a loss (or some other misfortune). More precisely, risk is a situation in which more than one outcome may occur and the probability of each outcome can be estimated. Probability is defined as a number between 0 and 1 that measures the chance of an event.

Содержание слайда: The Cost of Risk Some people are willing to bear more risk than others. In economics, people’s attitudes towards wealth are measured using the utility of wealth schedules. Utility of wealth is the amount of utility a given person attaches to a given amount of wealth.

Содержание слайда: The Utility of Wealth

Содержание слайда: What can we observe from the Utility of Wealth Schedule? Utility increases as wealth increases. Change in utility decreases as wealth increases. Marginal utility of decrease as $$ increase: From $0 to $3K, MU is 65 From $3K to $6K, MU is 20 From $6K to $9K, MU is 10 etc.

Содержание слайда: Translate Utility of Wealth into Expected Utility Due to uncertainty, people do not know the actual utility they will get from taking a particular action. An expected utility can be calculated by taking the average utility arising from all possible outcomes.

Содержание слайда: Choice Under Uncertainty

Содержание слайда: Interpretation of Choice under Uncertainty At Choice #1, Tania’s wealth is $5K, U=80, no risk, At Choice #2, she faces an opportunity to have $9K with utility of 95 or $3K with utility of 65. What is her expected utility? At expected wealth of $6K, E(U)=80. Thus, she is indifferent the two alternatives.

Содержание слайда: Risk Aversion and Risk Neutrality Risk Averse: Someone who sees risk as not cost-less. The degree of risk aversion a person has will depend how fast their marginal utility of wealth diminishes. The cost of risk to an individual will depend on the extent of risk aversion. For a risk-neutral person, risk is costless.

Содержание слайда: Choice Under Uncertainty for Risk Neutral Person

Содержание слайда: How do we reduce risk? Buy the ‘the cost of risk’ off. (similar to getting protection from the mob). Buying insurance is another way of reducing risk (and the only one that needs to be mentioned on the exam).

Содержание слайда: How does Insurance work? Insurance works by ‘pooling’ risks. Insurance is possible and profitable because people are risk averse. Probability of bad events is small, but costs of such an event (e.g., prostrate cancer) are large. Can estimate probability of bad events and price the cost of risk to individuals.

Содержание слайда: The Gains from Insurance

Содержание слайда: Understanding the Graph At $10K, utility is 100. If one loses health (or a another valued good), utility drops to 0. If probability of adverse event is 0.1, what is expected utility? At E(U)P=0.1, what is wealth with no insurance?

Содержание слайда: Understanding the Graph - 2 Up to what price will you buy insurance? What will insurance buy you? What is the minimum amount an insurance company will charge for insurance? If an insurance company offers a policy at $1,500 what will be it’s expected profit?

Содержание слайда: Moral Hazard & Adverse Selection Private information is information that is available to one person but is too costly for anyone else to obtain. If you can’t obtain the information you can be faced with a moral hazard or adverse selection problem.

Содержание слайда: Moral Hazard Defined: When one of two or more parities with an agreement has an incentive after the agreement is made to act in a manner that brings additional benefits to himself or herself at the expense of the other party. Examples? Why does moral hazard arise?

Содержание слайда: Adverse Selection Defined: The tendency for people to enter into agreements in which they use private information to their own advantage and to the disadvantage of the less informed party. General examples? Health examples?

Содержание слайда: Understanding the difference between the two People who face greater risks are more likely to purchase health insurance. Moral hazard or adverse selection? A person with insurance coverage for a loss has less incentives than an uninsured person to avoid such a loss. Moral hazard or adverse selection?

Содержание слайда: How do insurance companies overcome these problems? Find a signal to convey information from outside the market that can be used to detect these behaviors. An auto-insurance signal would be? A health insurance example would be? Another device is a deductible.

Содержание слайда: Examine Evolution of a Market Using the “Time Machine” from Davey & Goliath

Содержание слайда: Slow Day? Starr got you down? Consider….

Содержание слайда: Early Public Health Insurance First instance of public insurance is Germany’s 1883 ‘compulsory sickness insurance’. Followed by: Austria, 1888 Hungary, 1891 Second Wave: Norway, 1909 Serbia, 1910 Britain, 1911 Russia, 1912 Netherlands, 1913 Mutual Benefit Society expansions or State Aid to voluntary programs: French, 1910 Denmark, 1892 Switzerland, 1912

Содержание слайда: U.S. Public Health Insurance Failed proposals made in Congress for National Health Insurance: 1918-19 1935-36 1948 1974 1993-94 Successful Initiatives for Partial National Coverage 1966, Medicare – National health insurance program for elderly & disabled 1967, Medicaid – State sponsored programs for poor 1972, Medicare inclusion of End Stage Renal Disease patients 1997, State Children’s Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP) – State sponsored expansion of Medicaid for kids, added 3 million uninsured kids out of 11.6 million total uninsured kids by 2000. 2006, Part D, Senior coverage for drugs

Содержание слайда: Private Insurance – Two early models Fee-for-service insurance Epitomized by Blue Cross plan started for Baylor University employees in 1929 in Texas. Blue Cross – hospital insurance Blue Shield – physician insurance Prepaid Group Practice Epitomized by Kaiser Permanente (1937) Others include: Group Health Association (1937) eventually sold to Humana Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (1947)

Содержание слайда: Four characteristics of Blue Cross/Blue Shield fundamentally shaped American health care. Hospitals were reimbursed on a cost-plus basis. If Blue Cross patients accounted for 40 percent of a hospital's total patient days, Blue Cross was expected to pay for 40 percent of the hospital's total costs. If Medicare patients accounted for one-third of patient days, Medicare paid one-third of the total costs. Other insurers reimbursed hospitals in much the same way. For the most part, physicians and hospital managers were free to incur costs as they saw fit. The role of insurers was to pay the bills, with few questions asked. The philosophy of the Blues was that health insurance should cover all medical costs—even routine checkups and diagnostic procedures. The early Blue plans had no deductibles and no copayments; insurers paid the total bill and patients and physicians made choices with little interference from insurers. Therefore, health insurance was not really "insurance." Instead, it was prepayment for the consumption of medical care. Blues priced their policies based on what is called "community rating." In the early days this meant that everyone in a given geographical area was charged the same price for health insurance regardless of age, sex, occupation, or any other factor related to differences in real health risks. Even though a sixty-year-old can be expected to incur four times the health care costs of a twenty-five-year-old, for example, both paid the same premium. In this way higher-risk people were under-charged and lower-risk people were over-charged. The Blues adopted a pay-as-you-go approach to insurance instead of pricing their policies to generate reserves that would pay bills that weren't presented until future years (as life insurers and property and casualty insurers do). This meant that each year's premium income paid that year's health care costs. If a policyholder developed an illness that required treatment over several years, in each successive year insurers had to collect additional premiums from all policyholders to pay those additional costs.

Содержание слайда: Points of Inflection in Insurance Market -1 1930s – Great Depression reduces physician’s opposition to third party payment as consumers become unable to pay cash for services. 1940s – During World War II, firms start providing health insurance as benefit to attract workers due to wage freeze. Employers wrote it off as an expense rather than a form of wages. Congress caught on and tried to stop the practice, but employers and unions fought back an institutionalized the practice. 1945 – The McCarran-Ferguson Act: All health insurance is regulated at the state, not the federal level. 1966 – Medicare administration is out-sourced to regional Blue Cross Blue Shield plans. 1974 – National Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Act supports the creation of federal-sponsored managed care plans. 1974 - Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exempts plans run by unions or single employers from state regulation.

Содержание слайда: Points of Inflection in Insurance Market - 2 1983 – Medicare institutes prospective payment for hospital inpatient payment. 1992 – Medicare institutes the Resource Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) for physician payment. 1990s – Benefits carved out to specialized firms: Mental Health and prescription drugs to Pharmaceutical Benefits Managements frims 1996 – Congress authorizes expansion of Medical Savings Accounts 2001 – Birth of Consumer Directed Health Plans 2003 – Congress Authorizes Prescription payment for seniors and Health Savings Accounts 2006 – Start of Medicare Part D

Содержание слайда: State of Health Insurance Today Insurance models Demand side control programs Supply side control programs Market successes & failures

Содержание слайда: Insurance Models in 2007 9% Conventional Fee for Service/Managed Indemnity Payment is based on a fee-schedule or ‘Usual, Customary or Reasonable” fees. 24% HMO Payment by salary or ‘capitation’ Insurer owns ‘bricks & mortar’ 65% Preferred Provider Organization & Point of Service Plan Payment is based on set a fee schedule, usually indexed to Medicare’s RBRVS schedule, with negotiated discounts 2% Consumer Driven Health Plans

Содержание слайда: 2013: ACA Accelerated HDHP - Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type, 1988-2013

Содержание слайда: Insurance Tower of Babel PPO: Preferred Provider Organization (Medica) IDS: Integrated Delivery System (Fairview) HMO: Health Maintenance Organization (HealthPartners) PHO: Physician Hospital Organization (Park Nicollet) IPA: Independent Practice Association (passe) POS: Point of Service – Patient gets choices at service time CDHP: Consumer Driven Health Plan HDHP: High Deductible Health Plan Gatekeeper: Physician, usually a primary care physician (general, family practitioner, internal medicine or pediatrician) who control’s patient access to specialists and other services.

Содержание слайда: CDHP Business Enablers ‘Ready to Lease’ Components of Health Insurance: Electronic claims processing National panel of physicians National pharmaceutical benefits management firms Consumer-friendly health data web portals Disease management vendors Internet Transaction medium for claims processing 2-way communication with members ERISA-exemption Lack of state oversight Half the US commercial health insurance market is self-insured.

Содержание слайда: CDHP Component Details

Содержание слайда: …The HSA Model

Содержание слайда: Demand Side Controls ‘Affect the consumer to mitigate moral hazard’ Coinsurance, Copayments, Deductibles Specialist access through ‘gatekeeper’ physicians. Disease management Pricing differentials to consumers: Preferred providers in PPO & POS Formularies: Reimburse only cost of generic drug if generic substitute is available.

Содержание слайда: Supply Side Controls ‘Reduce the probability of provider induced demand’ Fee schedules Diagnosis Related Groups RBRVS Outpatient DRGs Utilization management Deny claims payment for unnecessary services Deny authorization for treatment Redirect patient care to less expensive options Case management Organize care for patient Streamline care process – look for efficiencies that improve outcomes or at worst have a neutral effect.

Содержание слайда: Insurance ‘Market Success’ Primary funding source of medical innovation in the United States. Consumers have more provider and treatment choices and less rationing than other industrialized firms. Flexible market that creates workarounds for changing health economy and politics.

Содержание слайда: Insurance ‘Market Failures’ 50+ million uninsured (at any point in time) prior to ACA 120% health insurance premium increase from 2000 to 2011 Moral hazard not checked? Medical technology driving moral hazard? Defensive medicine? Issue commands national attention along with economy, defense, and taxes as being at a crisis point.

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда: Question for Reflection How uniquely American is evolution of the insurance market in the 20th century? Name three unique historic moments that uniquely shaped the insurance market by 2015?

Содержание слайда: The Uninsured Problem Who are the uninsured? Why is this a ‘market failure’? If government were to prioritize, who among the uninsured you would extend coverage too would you? Easiest to hardest to ‘enroll’ get maximum ‘person effect’ Reach people with greatest utility from insurance first Another strategy Why are the number of uninsured growing? Is this a federal problem? Should it have a federal or state solution?

Содержание слайда: Who Are the Uninsured?

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда: Does theory square with health insurance today? What is the purpose of insurance? How is modern health insurance like general insurance? How is it different? Is it different for an idiosyncratic reason or is it tied back to the theory of insurance? What example of a pure form insurance is available in the health insurance market today?

Содержание слайда: Insurance: In Theory

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда: One Insurance Reform Option (G.H.W. Bush ’92, M. Romney ’06, and H.R. Clinton & B. Obama ‘08) ‘Pay or Play’ Firms pay worker’s premium into insurance pool or Firms play by covering workers

Содержание слайда: What has the Uninsured Problem been Proposed to be Addressed? Pay or play Federal effort failed in 1992. States options depend on economic strength of states. Hilary and President Obama’s proposal in 2008; Rodney’s MA policy in 2006 – NOW our current law. National health insurance Proposed: 1918;1935;1948;1965;1974;1994 DOA: Always What’s changed now? Two World Wars, a depression and two recessions couldn’t provide a catalyst. Incremental coverage additions Medicare (1966), Medicaid (1967), ESRD (1974), SCHIP (1997) Track record of success, but goes incrementalism cost more in the long run?

Содержание слайда: What is the minimal form of health insurance you can live with? High-deductible catastrophic Service-specific coverage only (long term care, dental, pharmacy) Health savings accounts Kaiser-style HMO PPO Fee-for-service

Содержание слайда: The Free-Rider Problem Free-rider is a person who consumes a good without paying for it. The problem is that quantity of the good that a person is able to consume is not influenced by the amount a person pays for the good.

Содержание слайда: Break

Содержание слайда: Health Insurance Market Today Health Economist Health Reform Priors Current Law Overview Coverage and Financing Insurance Markets Exchanges Payment Reform Projected Financial Impact on US Economy Medicaid Expansion Twists

Содержание слайда: Priors as a Health Economist Health economists find that technology is both good for society and huge cost driver. Nothing in the Bills passed will measurably bend the cost curve down. Health insurance actuaries find the best way to keep costs within general inflation is through catastrophic/high-deductible insurance. Advocating catastrophic insurance for all might be the surest way to a two year House of Representatives visit.

Содержание слайда: Coverage and Financing Coverage: 32 of 54 million uninsured covered 24 million in Exchange 16 million in Medicaid Loss of 8 million from individual and group coverage Financing: Half from reduced spending in Medicare and Medicaid and half from tax provisions Medicare/Medicaid: Medicare FFS payments, Medicare Advantage, Part D pharmaceutical discounts, Medicaid drug rebates, DSH, and small amount from payment reform Tax Provisions: Medicare FICA tax, insurer and pharmaceutical assessments, medical device tax, “Cadillac” tax, FSA and HSA tax changes, tax deductibility of medical expenses to 10%, and tanning bed tax

Содержание слайда: Insurance Market: 2010 Effective Immediately: Annual process set by HHS and States for premium rate review. $250 million available to States from FY 2010 through FY 2014 Effective Within 90 Days: Temporary High Risk Pool through December 2013 for those uninsured for at least 6 months with a pre-existing condition. Premiums not to exceed 100% of standard individual rate, with 4 to 1 rating range allowed for age. Effective Plan Years on or After 6 Months Post Enactment: (Provisions apply to fully-insured and self-insured) No lifetime benefit limits and “restricted” annual benefit limits Dependent coverage to age 26 Coverage of preventive services without cost-sharing No pre-ex for kids under 19 No rescissions, except in cases of fraud

Содержание слайда: NAIC Health Reform Committees HHS is required to consult with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). The NAIC has developed the following committees to provide recommendations to HHS on: Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Premium Rate Review Rescission Procedures Medigap Reform Exchanges Individual Market Reform Group Market Reform Uniform Fraud Reporting Reinsurance and Risk Adjustment Interstate Compacts HHS and State Data Collection Uniform Enrollment, Standard Definitions, and Disclosures MEWA Fraud Provisions Cost Containment

Содержание слайда: Insurance Market: 2011 Effective January 2011: 80% MLR for individual and small group, 85% MLR for large group. NAIC is to develop definition and methodologies for MLR calculation. Clinical to include “activities that improve health care quality.” Taxes and regulatory fees excluded from non-clinical. .

Содержание слайда: New Federal Health Reform Structure -2010 New “Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight” established within HHS on April 19th, with four programs: Office of Oversight Office of Insurance Programs Office of Consumer Support Office of Health Insurance Exchanges Established to implement private market reforms and work with CMS to ensure coordination between public and private market reforms

Содержание слайда: Exchanges: 2010 Effective July 2010: HHS with States to establish internet portal to identify coverage options. Information to be provided for individual and group plans, Medicaid, CHIP, and high risk pools. By June 2010, HHS to develop format for comparison of options including MLR, eligibility, availability, premium rates, and cost-sharing. The new HHS “Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight” will compile and maintain information for the internet portal. Rule will require information on insurers (from Commerce), HMOs (from Health) and public plans (from DHS). Will be moved under CMS from fear of budget cuts from GOP House members.

Содержание слайда: Exchanges: 2014 Effective 2014: States to establish Exchange to facilitate comparison shopping, enrollment, and subsidy administration for qualified health plans or HHS will establish. Standards: “As soon as practical,” HHS to set standards for plan certification, marketing, network adequacy, plan rating, “Navigators”, and risk sharing. States to create electronic interchange for eligibility for Medicaid and subsidies. Funding: Within 1 year of enactment, $2 billion to States for Exchange start-up. Structure: State may create separate or combined Exchange for individuals and small groups. Regional and subsidiary Exchanges for distinct State geographies also allowed. Operated by governmental or non-profit entity (not Medicaid agency or health plan). Eligibility: Individuals not eligible for “affordable” employer coverage and small groups. States may allow large groups starting 2017. Outside Market: Benefit rules, rating rules, and risk sharing apply inside and outside Exchange. Subsidies only available for plans inside Exchange. Section 125: May only be used by employers offering “group plan” through Exchange.

Содержание слайда: Payment Reform & Care Coordination CMS Innovation Center: Created in 2011 to test and expand Medicare and Medicaid payment models, including State all-payer models and other state proposals. Medicaid and Medicare efforts, pilots and demonstrations, for example: Medicaid Global Payment Demonstration (5 states) for capitation payments for safety net hospitals. (2010) 90% FMAP for Medicaid “medical home” for those with chronic conditions. States to develop payment method. (2011) Medicaid Bundled Payment Demonstration (8 states). (2012) Value-Based Purchasing for a variety of Medicare providers with percent of payment tied to quality (Development starting in 2011) Medicare payment incentives/penalties to reduce hospital readmissions. (2012) Medicare Bundled Payment Pilot. (2013)

Содержание слайда: National Impact of Health Reform Uninsured status is reduced by 59.8% (81% if base is US citizens only) to newly cover approximately 30.7 million people CBO Estimates – 3/18/2010 CBO 10 year cost: $940 billion CBO deficit savings $130 billion Parente/HSI Estimates – 3/19/2010 10 year cost: $1.36 trillion Summary: Additional costs will eliminate deficit savings and add to deficit by $287 billion

Содержание слайда: CBO: 2010-2019 Spend

Содержание слайда: CBO: 2010-2019 Tax/Save

Содержание слайда: CBO: Projected Savings on Vote Eve, March 21, 2010

Содержание слайда: CBO: Projected Additional Cost/Savings of Pending Changes

Содержание слайда: Current vs. Pending Budget Effect – CBO’s Own Numbers

Содержание слайда: Train Wrecks Do Happen In DC

Содержание слайда: Does this Look Familiar?

Содержание слайда: Or This?

Содержание слайда: Guess the Year? Guess the Authors?

Содержание слайда: Guess the Year? Guess the Authors?

Содержание слайда: Implementation Iceberg Cometh?

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда: Even Friends can Wound if Implementation Poor

Содержание слайда: ACA Privacy Nightmare?

Содержание слайда: Not all data hacked – just the parts that let you create a fake credit card account

Содержание слайда: Major Reform Component – Medicaid Expansion The Act transforms Medicaid into a program to meet the health care needs of the entire non-elderly population with income below 133% of the FPL. Estimate: 18 M additional individuals would be eligible for Medicaid. Post-ACA: If individual states accept this provision to expand Medicaid, the federal government will cover the 100% of the cost for Medicaid expansion through 2016. In 2017, match is 95%; in 2020, match is 90% The Act gives HHS has the authority to penalize States that choose not to participate in the Medicaid expansion by taking away their existing Medicaid funding. Decision: Medicaid expansion violates Congress’ spending clause power as unconstitutionally coercive.

Содержание слайда: Supreme Court Ruling “Gun to the Head” Rationale: “…the financial “inducement” Congress has chosen is much more than “relatively mild encouragement”—it is a gun to the head. A State that opts out …stands to lose not merely “a relatively small percentage” of its existing Medicaid funding, but all of it. Medicaid spending accounts for over 20 % of the average State’s total budget, with federal funds covering 50 to 83 % of those costs.” “The threatened loss of over 10 percent of a State’s overall budget is economic dragooning that leaves the States with no real option but to acquiesce in the Medicaid expansion.” Remedy (to preclude severability): The constitutional violation is fully remedied by precluding the Secretary of HHS from making all of a state’s existing Medicaid funds contingent upon the state’s compliance with the ACA Medicaid expansion.

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда: What if ‘Vocal’ Republican 6 States Opt out? Covered Lives – FL, LA, MS, NE, SC, TX

Содержание слайда: What if ‘Vocal’ Republican 6 States Opt out? $$$ Impact – FL, LA, MS, NE, SC, TX

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда: Next Supreme Court Ruling, June 2015 Are Insurance Subsidies Legal in 34 States using Federal Exchange? Something like this can be modelled. How should I and my merry modelers complete the analysis? Which states sit out? For how will they sit out (years)?

Содержание слайда:

Содержание слайда: Some Insights from themorningconsult.com (2/11/2015)

Содержание слайда: If Asked: A 21st Century Version of Health Insurance Reform Get actuarially certified risk profiles for all insured based on existing data Let people get them like they would a credit report Equifax and Experian are standing by and waiting for the go-switch Government and private federal exchanges portals Take risk profiles from (1) and provide a ‘lock in’ by Internet click Target the younger population not buying coverage today through the web. Brokers handle the rest. Gives brokers time to get a Plan B. Where the market fails from (2), auction off the high risk Given (1) and (2), who are the vulnerable and why Target resources to fill the insurance gaps using federal and state resources Let the Employer-sponsored market evolve; it’s not broken

Содержание слайда: Details worth watching in Health Reform evolution 2015-16 Supreme Court Decision in June, 2015 on State Exchanges The GOP Unicorn / Replace Plan Trojan Horse National Health Insurance / Medicare 4 All Mandate tax  FICA tax for under 65s Medical Device Tax repeal What States will Take Medicaid expansion Benefit inclusions from ACA regs for minimum coverage Device manufacturers, Hospital bundled payment and Jedi : (‘these are not the device costs you are looking for”).

Содержание слайда: Closing Thoughts We are going to get a great natural experiment in economics, political science and law. Expansion could become a political football subject to state elections for years to come until an equilibrium is reached. 2016 election obviously key for future policy trajectory. But, it just one data point in 100+ year evolution.

Содержание слайда: Midterm Exam Covers materials on PowerPoints Short Answer (40%) Definitions (30%) Essay (30%) Extra Credit (up to 10%)